Skip to content

Human Rights and Duties · Free lesson

Origin and Evolution of Human Rights and International Standards

8 min read5 practice questions with worked solutionsFree — no sign-in

Share with your study groupWhatsApp

What it is

Unit II traces human rights from ancient and medieval thought, through the 17th–18th-century revolutions, to the post-1945 standards: the UDHR, the two Covenants and the core conventions, the Vienna Declaration (1993), the Helsinki and ASEAN texts, and the Responsibility to Protect. UGC-NET examines it through dates, sequences, article numbers and "match the instrument" items, so a clean timeline is the main tool.

Core concepts

Human rights in ancient thought. The Code of Hammurabi (c. 18th century BCE) made law public and written; the Cyrus Cylinder, issued after Cyrus took Babylon in 539 BCE, is often called an early charter of tolerance, a reading historians dispute. Sophocles' Antigone appeals to unwritten laws above a ruler's edict; the Stoics taught a universal law of reason, and Cicero called true law right reason in agreement with nature. Roman law separated jus civile, jus gentium and jus naturale. In India, dharma bound rulers, the Buddha rejected birth-based hierarchy, and Ashoka's edicts (3rd century BCE) urged respect for all sects. Aristotle defended natural slavery: ancient rights were not universal.

Middle Ages and Magna Carta. Augustine held an unjust law to be no law, and Aquinas ranked eternal, natural, human and divine law. King John sealed Magna Carta at Runnymede on 15 June 1215 under pressure from the barons; the Pope annulled it within months, but it was reissued in 1216, 1217 and 1225. Clause 39 bars seizing or imprisoning a free man except by the lawful judgement of his peers or the law of the land; clause 40 promises that justice will not be sold, denied or delayed. It protected free men, not all, yet it rooted due process and the ruler's subjection to law, carried on by the Petition of Right (1628), Habeas Corpus Act (1679) and English Bill of Rights (1689).

Lockean natural rights and the American documents. Locke's law of nature gives rights to life, liberty and estate; government exists by consent to protect them and may be resisted if it breaks that trust. The Declaration of Independence (4 July 1776), drafted mainly by Jefferson, proclaims unalienable rights to "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" and government by consent of the governed. The US Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments, was ratified in 1791: the First protects religion, speech, press, assembly and petition; the Fourth bars unreasonable searches; the Fifth gives due process; the Eighth bars cruel and unusual punishment.

The French Revolution. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (26 August 1789) has 17 articles: men are born and remain free and equal in rights (Art. 1); the natural and imprescriptible rights are liberty, property, security and resistance to oppression (Art. 2); sovereignty resides in the nation (Art. 3); law expresses the general will (Art. 6), echoing Rousseau. Liberty, equality and fraternity became the Revolution's watchword and later Vasak's template for the three generations; Olympe de Gouges's counter-declaration (1791) exposed its silence on women.

Marxist revolutions, anti-colonial movements and India's freedom movement. The Russian (1917) and Chinese (1949) revolutions put work, education and social security ahead of civil liberties, and the Cold War split the UDHR's rights into two Covenants. Anti-colonial struggle made self-determination the gateway right: Bandung (1955), GA Resolution 1514 (1960) on independence for colonial peoples, and common Article 1 of the Covenants. In India, the Nehru Report (1928) listed fundamental rights and the Karachi session of the Congress (1931) passed a resolution on fundamental rights and economic policy, foreshadowing Parts III and IV.

UDHR (1948) and the new states. The General Assembly adopted the UDHR (resolution 217 A (III)) in Paris on 10 December 1948, now Human Rights Day, by 48 votes to none with 8 abstentions. Eleanor Roosevelt chaired the drafting, with René Cassin, John Humphrey, P.C. Chang and Charles Malik; India's Hansa Mehta secured "all human beings" in place of "all men". Its 30 articles run: 1–2 dignity and non-discrimination, 3–21 civil and political, 22–27 economic, social and cultural, 28–30 order, duties and limits. Not a treaty, much of it is now regarded as customary law; it heads the International Bill of Human Rights. New states copied it: UDHR Art. 3 reappears in India's Art. 21, Art. 4 in Art. 23 and Art. 26 in Art. 21A.

The International Covenants (1966). Both were adopted on 16 December 1966; the ICESCR entered into force on 3 January 1976 and the ICCPR on 23 March 1976, and India acceded to both in 1979. The ICCPR binds immediately; Article 4 permits emergency derogation, but never from Arts. 6, 7, 8(1)–(2), 11, 15, 16 and 18. Its 18-member Human Rights Committee hears complaints under the First Optional Protocol (1966); the Second (1989) aims at abolishing the death penalty. The ICESCR requires progressive realisation to the maximum of available resources (Art. 2(1)); its 18-member committee (CESCR) was set up by ECOSOC in 1985, not by the treaty.

Other core conventions. CERD (1965, in force 1969) was the first core treaty. CEDAW (1979, in force 1981) has a 23-member committee; India ratified it in 1993. CAT (1984, in force 1987) bans torture absolutely; India signed in 1997 but has not ratified (as of 2026-10). The CRC (1989, in force 1990), the most widely ratified rights treaty, defines a child as under 18; India acceded in 1992. The Migrant Workers Convention (1990, in force 2003) has no Indian ratification (as of 2026-10). The CRPD (2006, in force 2008) adopts the social model of disability; India ratified in 2007 and enacted the RPwD Act 2016.

State responsibility and R2P. States must respect, protect and fulfil rights. The ICISS report (2001) recast sovereignty as responsibility; the 2005 World Summit Outcome (paras. 138–139) endorsed the Responsibility to Protect for four crimes only: genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity. The Secretary-General's 2009 report gave three pillars: the state's own duty, international assistance, and timely, decisive collective action through the Security Council when a state manifestly fails. Resolution 1973 (2011) on Libya is the leading Pillar III case.

Vienna Declaration (1993). The World Conference on Human Rights at Vienna (June 1993), 25 years after Tehran (1968), adopted the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action by consensus of 171 states. It declared all human rights universal, indivisible, interdependent and interrelated (para. 5), linked democracy, development and human rights (para. 8), called women's rights an inalienable, integral and indivisible part of universal human rights (para. 18), and recommended a High Commissioner for Human Rights, created by GA Resolution 48/141 (December 1993).

Helsinki and ASEAN Declarations. The Helsinki Final Act (1 August 1975) of the CSCE, signed by 35 states including the USA and USSR, set a Decalogue whose Principle VII is respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms; it inspired Helsinki Watch (later Human Rights Watch), and the CSCE became the OSCE in 1995. The WMA Declaration of Helsinki (1964) is a different text, on medical research ethics. The ASEAN Human Rights Declaration (Phnom Penh, 18 November 2012) affirms universality but places rights in the regional and national context and balances them with duties.

Worked example

Build the treaty timeline and compute the gaps. Gap = year in force minus year adopted.

InstrumentAdoptedIn forceGap in years
CERD196519694
ICCPR1966197610
ICESCR1966197610
CEDAW197919812
CAT198419873
CRC198919901
ICMW1990200313
CRPD200620082

Step 1, extremes: the longest wait is the ICMW (2003 − 1990 = 13), the shortest the CRC (1990 − 1989 = 1). Step 2, sum: 4 + 10 + 10 + 2 + 3 + 1 + 13 + 2 = 45; in pairs, 14 + 12 + 4 + 15 = 45. Step 3, the Covenants: from 3 January to 23 March 1976 (a leap year) is 28 + 29 + 23 = 80 days, so the ICESCR came first. Step 4, from the UDHR (1948): Covenants adopted 18 years later, in force 28 years later; Vienna 45 years later.

Common traps

  • The ICCPR is listed first, but the ICESCR entered into force first (January vs March 1976).
  • The CESCR was created by ECOSOC (1985), not the ICESCR; the ICCPR's Human Rights Committee is not the Human Rights Council (2006).
  • The UDHR is a resolution, adopted with no votes against (48–0–8).
  • Namesakes: Helsinki Final Act (1975) vs WMA Helsinki (1964); ASEAN founding Declaration (1967), Bangkok Declaration (1993) and ASEAN Human Rights Declaration (2012).
  • R2P covers only four atrocity crimes, not every rights violation.

Speed technique

  • Chant the core treaties: Race 1965, Covenants 1966, Women 1979, Torture 1984, Child 1989, Migrants 1990, Disability 2006.
  • Committee size: assume 18, except CEDAW (23) and CAT (10).
  • UDHR blocks: 1–2, 3–21, 22–27, 28–30.

Check yourself

  1. When was the UDHR adopted, and what was the vote?
    Show answer
    10 December 1948, 48–0 with 8 abstentions — no state voted against.
  2. Which Covenant entered into force first?
    Show answer
    The ICESCR — 3 January 1976, 80 days before the ICCPR.
  3. Which Helsinki principle deals with human rights?
    Show answer
    Principle VII — respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.
  4. Which crimes does R2P cover?
    Show answer
    Genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, crimes against humanity — per the 2005 World Summit.
  5. Which office did Vienna 1993 recommend?
    Show answer
    UN High Commissioner for Human Rights — created by GA Resolution 48/141.

Try it: Origin and Evolution of Human Rights and International Standards questions

Real questions from the NET Human Rights bank on exactly this skill. Pick an answer to see the full solution — the intuition, the worked steps, the faster methods and the traps.

  1. NET Human Rightshuman rightsQuestion 1 of 5

    The words 'Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness' are listed as unalienable rights in:

    Show the answer and worked solution

    Answer: option D

    The Declaration of Independence of 4 July 1776, drafted mainly by Thomas Jefferson, holds that all men are created equal and endowed with unalienable rights, among them "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness".

    It adds that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, an idea that echoes Locke.

    So the phrase comes from the US Declaration of Independence, option D.

  2. NET Human Rightshuman rightsQuestion 2 of 5

    Which Indian delegate to the UN Commission on Human Rights is credited with changing 'all men' to 'all human beings' in Article 1 of the UDHR?

    Show the answer and worked solution

    Answer: option B

    Hansa Mehta, India's delegate on the Commission on Human Rights in 1947–48, argued that "all men are born free and equal" could be read to exclude women.

    Article 1 as adopted reads "All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights".

    So the change is credited to Hansa Mehta, option B.

  3. NET Human Rightshuman rightsQuestion 3 of 5

    Consider the following two statements: Statement I: The Helsinki Final Act is a code of ethics for medical research adopted by the World Medical Association. Statement II: The Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe, which produced the Helsinki Final Act, became the OSCE in 1995. In the light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options.

    Show the answer and worked solution

    Answer: option D

    Statement I: the Helsinki Final Act of 1 August 1975 was signed by 35 states, including the USA and the USSR, and its Principle VII commits them to respect human rights; the medical-research text is the separate WMA Declaration of Helsinki of 1964. Statement I is false.

    Statement II: the CSCE was renamed the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe from 1995; Statement II is true.

    So Statement I, "The Helsinki Final Act is a code…", is false and Statement II is true, option D.

  4. NET Human Rightshuman rightsQuestion 4 of 5

    Which of the following took part in drafting the Universal Declaration of Human Rights? I. René Cassin II. John Humphrey III. P.C. Chang IV. Karel Vasak Choose the correct answer from the options.

    Show the answer and worked solution

    Answer: option C

    The drafting work of the Commission on Human Rights, chaired by Eleanor Roosevelt, involved René Cassin of France, P.C. Chang of China and Charles Malik of Lebanon, with John Humphrey of the UN Secretariat preparing the first draft.

    Karel Vasak, by contrast, proposed the three generations of rights in 1977, long after the Declaration.

    So the UDHR drafters in this list are I, II and III only, option C.

  5. NET Human Rightshuman rightsQuestion 5 of 5

    Arrange the following in chronological order: I. Adoption of the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration II. Signing of the Helsinki Final Act III. Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty IV. Adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights V. Adoption of the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action Choose the correct answer from the options.

    Show the answer and worked solution

    Answer: option A

    UDHR: 1948. Helsinki Final Act: 1975. Vienna Declaration: 1993. ICISS report on the Responsibility to Protect: 2001. ASEAN Human Rights Declaration: 2012.

    Taken by date, the sequence of the numerals is IV, II, V, III, I.

    So the order, beginning with the UDHR of 1948, is IV, II, V, III, I, option A.

Answer above — every one shows its working.

Sign in free to keep going: 20 free questions in all, with your progress and mistakes saved.

Keep practising free

More free NET Human Rights lessons

See the whole NET Human Rights syllabus

Spot a mistake, or something unclear? Tell us — every message is read.